From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 21 04:06:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CE4F644; Thu, 21 May 2015 04:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F6016D7; Thu, 21 May 2015 04:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pabru16 with SMTP id ru16so90936109pab.1; Wed, 20 May 2015 21:06:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VGk4NC/f5E47v+VuJ6eXOhLtHxwGMG7bYi7/+xj+yck=; b=t31c09yiuYT1fYssihgXRYtsFn/qQk85ccihxzBTgqqfBLDoMl1EiDqGxZNTJhYIlT 4nJ7vVx+Xdx/L9vBebVIqrKXLCdTJjStc+Xv65dvscuhyjPsuRTI+4ejJfEHPcfgyeB5 IQVc57OWJAWqnXTC3Xu3eNvwG4ltleKiKB2+slVPpEq9Hb4WgpA2gCZ8wTQSY8Nf7620 9fq82X2nvTI6pz37LxinDnPwnyUtk+Unird1aRMww6EgH+1e+k2Dq1PnejeROsnKJGP5 K19tbTUcncb5jSemUJ4ejs/MdJmKMgGfpt3pFHKz2L5CKNyLzgRaASOGsS4vuX+55P1J Egbg== X-Received: by 10.68.65.68 with SMTP id v4mr1516373pbs.31.1432181194862; Wed, 20 May 2015 21:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (ppp59-167-128-11.static.internode.on.net. [59.167.128.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v5sm17627939pdo.29.2015.05.20.21.06.31 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 May 2015 21:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r386873 - head/security/ca_root_nss/files References: <201505201808.t4KI8ajp012568@svn.freebsd.org> <555D4216.5060303@FreeBSD.org> <555D5504.3030106@FreeBSD.org> To: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: Bryan Drewery , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin From: Kubilay Kocak X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <555D59C1.1020301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 14:06:25 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 04:06:35 -0000 On 21/05/2015 1:58 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2015, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> On 5/20/15 9:25 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >>> On 21/05/2015 4:08 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >>>> Author: bjk (doc committer) >>>> Date: Wed May 20 18:08:35 2015 >>>> New Revision: 386873 >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/386873 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> Fix spelling of "certification authority" >>>> >>>> Approved by: portmgr (bapt), bapt (ports committer) >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> head/security/ca_root_nss/files/pkg-message.in >>>> >>> >>>> -FreeBSD does not, and can not warrant that the certificate authorities >>>> +FreeBSD does not, and can not warrant that the certification authorities >>>> whose certificates are included in this package have in any way been >>>> audited for trustworthiness or RFC 3647 compliance. > This pkg-message is in the context of the Web PKI, and TLS. TLS is an > IETF standard; IETF documents are published as RFCs, the official > repository of which is hosted by the RFC Editor. > > The RFC Editor maintains a list of expansions of abbreviations: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt Today I learned. Awesome. > In this context, I believe it is quite unambiguous that CA expands to > "certification authority", and a great deal of traffic on the IETF mailing > lists supports the lack of ambiguity. Agreed. > Apparently there is ambiguity in the minds of others (yourselves), though; > it probably would have been better to have this discussion prior to the > commit. I can revert it during the discussion, if you wish. There was, it's just (way) less ambiguous and evidenced now :) No revert necessary, I just wanted to declare the original intent. The abbreviation expansion link would have been great in the commit log (prior conversation or otherwise). Thanks for teaching me something! :) > -Ben >