From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Apr 13 7:46:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail5.registeredsite.com (mail5.registeredsite.com [64.224.9.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBA037B424 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 07:46:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tech_info@threespace.com) Received: from mail.threespace.com (mail.threespace.com [216.247.134.44]) by mail5.registeredsite.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3DEki511663 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:46:44 -0400 Received: from CX1063714-B.threespace.com [65.14.36.167] by mail.threespace.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.05) id A14A1A8000B6; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:46:34 -0400 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010413104204.037a7f00@mail.threespace.com> X-Sender: tech_info@mail.threespace.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:42:44 -0400 To: FreeBSD Chat From: Technical Information Subject: Re: Just an observation - MUA's seen in the lists Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ Sorry for not sending this to the entire list before, Chip W. ] I think the man (Brett Glass) was making a joke. I think he was. :-/ Anyway, I've been using Eudora on Windows for years now, before I had started experimenting with FreeBSD. I know it well, and for the most part I like it. I'm not very tempted to move my e-mail client unless Eudora for FreeBSD emerges. ;-) And for tasks like e-mail, I find the Eudora interface on the Windows GUI easy to use. (Again, it's familiar to me.) Does my Windows stability match FreeBSD's on the same system? No, not close. But for reading e-mail, it's good enough. --Chip Morton At 09:50 AM 4/13/2001, you wrote: >So you believe windoze to be more reliable than BSD? You would rather >put your mission-critical data on a windoze box (which is generally >accepted by the industry as less reliable than a *nix box)? Maybe eudora >is a better, in some ways, mua than most of the *nix mua's, but that >isn't the OS. I use FreeBSD everyday on my workstation and on several >other machines at home, and they have never crashed or had any of the >problems the windoze machines seem to be prone to. >You make an intersting statement. > >-- >Chip > >On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 00:07:58 -0600 >Brett Glass surely must have wrote something like: > > > At 11:26 PM 4/12/2001, Chip Wiegand wrote: > > > > >I recently noticed, while reading through these lists, that a large > > >number of messages posted are coming from windoze computers. This is > > >just a observation, based on the header that shows the mua the >message > > >was sent from. > > > > It's OK to use an unreliable machine for your MUA, just so long as > > your mission-critical data is backed up on a machine running a > > RELIABLE operating system! > > > > --Brett Glass, who's writing this on Eudora on a Windows box > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message