From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Mar  6 15:47:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA20442
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 15:47:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fps.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA20404;
          Thu, 6 Mar 1997 15:46:51 -0800 (PST)
From: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co
Received: from localhost by fps.biblos.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA22346; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 18:50:34 -0500
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 18:50:32 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co
To: ports@freebsd.org
Cc: emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Cross debuggers
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.3.95.970306183844.41018A-100000@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Howdy,
I'm building crosscompilers for DOS, SCO and Linux. The DOS crosscompiler
is ready, but the emulated-UNIX counterparts may take some more time (No
one with those boxes nearby):(.
The UNIX cross compilers will probably be submitted *after* the ports
freeze: Would it be useful to "port" the cross-debuggers? I don`t know
what type of cores will be produced by our emulation (don`t have way 
of testing this either).

Pedro.