From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Aug 5 18:41:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns.shellworld.net (ns.shellworld.net [64.29.16.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F1E37B401 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 18:41:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tforrest@ns.shellworld.net) Received: (from tforrest@localhost) by ns.shellworld.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA22069; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 21:41:44 -0400 Message-Id: <200108060141.VAA22069@ns.shellworld.net> From: "Tommy Forrest - KE4PYM" To: "Matthew Emmerton" Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:43:19 -0400 Reply-To: "Tommy Forrest - KE4PYM" X-Mailer: BluePrint Software Works PMMail2000 with Bandit Tagger98 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Tag: Bandit Tagger98 - Registered to : KE4PYM Subject: Re: ARRRRGH *WHAT* Am I doing wrong with IPFW, NAT and PPP? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After plugging gateway_enable="YES" *AND* setting the netmask on ep0 I finally got everything working. Its always those little things. Thanks for your help. On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 21:34:32 -0400 (EDT), Matthew Emmerton wrote: >On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Tommy Forrest - KE4PYM wrote: > >> I've been at this too long. I must say, it is *MUCH* easier to setup 2 >> NICs to do NAT than it is with dialup. > >[ snip preamble and rc.conf ] > >Where is 'gateway_enable="YES"' in rc.conf? > >-- >Matt Emmerton > Tommy Forrest - KE4PYM - tforrest@shellworld.net http://www.shellworld.net/~tforrest And now, its time, for some useless, bandwidth wasting words of wisdom: OS/2 not just another pretty program loader! PGP Public Key Fingerprint: B9ED C46F C92E 0101 4B4C BFC1 907C A0D0 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message