From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Nov 9 21:18:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA03636 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 21:18:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA03631 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 21:18:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wghhicks@ix.netcom.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id XAA24979; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 23:16:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from atl-ga15-03.ix.netcom.com(204.32.174.99) by dfw-ix14.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma024927; Sun Nov 9 23:15:57 1997 Message-ID: <3466987D.4C14CA3E@ix.netcom.com> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 00:15:41 -0500 From: Jerry Hicks Reply-To: wghhicks@ix.netcom.com Organization: TerraEarth X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03b8 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Shevchenko CC: Douglas Carmichael , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Could FreeBSD be a viable platform for large SQL/SAP/etc enterprise applications? References: <199711092354.RAA02551@dcarmich.pr.mcs.net> <3466B8D3.3FC2B89C@Shevchenko.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Ruslan Shevchenko wrote: > --- FreeBSD can't run pure Java APPS > (so, it'a bad client) This simply is not true. Although many do consider Java to be a bad *language*. FreeBSD has been *much* better for us in commercial settings that Linux or SCO. Jerry Hicks jerry_hicks@bigfoot.com