From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Mar 1 14:47:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA02941 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 14:47:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu (albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.31]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA02931 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 14:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu by albert.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12GNU) with ESMTP id RAA10768; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 17:49:18 -0500 Received: by kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/4.0) id ; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 17:47:03 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 17:47:03 -0500 Message-Id: <199703012247.RAA25698@kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu> To: spatula@gulf.net CC: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Prisoner on Sat, 1 Mar 1997 09:00:04 -0600 (CST)) Subject: Re: RC5 RSA contest thing From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have one nearly completely idle FreeBSD box (does nothing but compile my hacks), and one fairly idle RS/6000 at work. However, neither of these have direct access to the net. Is there any way for them to help under these circumstances? Best, joelh -- http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu All my opinions are my own, not the FSF's, my employer's, or my dog's. Second law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation -- core dumped