From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 11:46:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C8E16A4B3; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (helenius.fi [193.64.42.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A66343FF5; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:46:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from he.iki.fi (h81.vuokselantie10.fi [193.64.42.129]) by silver.he.iki.fi (8.12.9/8.11.4) with ESMTP id h91Ik0Nn031477; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:46:00 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Message-ID: <3F7B20E5.6010301@he.iki.fi> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 21:45:57 +0300 From: Petri Helenius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030916 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce M Simpson References: <20030917182850.Q52432-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> <20030918014203.GA59403@k7.mavetju> <3F694D56.9040609@he.iki.fi> <20030918124311.GC3431@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3F6A1CA9.5030701@he.iki.fi> <20030918210538.GB2720@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3F6A2710.5090000@he.iki.fi> <20031001171158.GK13612@saboteur.dek.spc.org> In-Reply-To: <20031001171158.GK13612@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Josh Brooks cc: fenner@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I would like to tcpdump and get all the packets... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 18:46:03 -0000 Bruce M Simpson wrote: > >This is coming up more often. Perhaps we should consider net/libpcap-devel >and net/tcpdump-devel ports for people who wish to track CVS and/or >snapshots of these tools? This might relieve some of the pressure on Bill >to update the vendor branch so often. > > > How often is "so often"? The vendor branch is over a year old and the bug that seems to annoy most real users of bpf has been known for quite a while longer and took a while to get into the origin and now it only would need to be imported once. Or is there some larger issues I´m missing or is everybody asking the same thing for the same reason and a single update would "calm down" the chatter? Pete