From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Feb 11 16:12:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A6F37B4EC for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:12:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1BNC2L04311; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:12:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200102112312.f1BNC2L04311@ptavv.es.net> To: ben@cahostnet.net Cc: Tim McMillen , Sean Cull , "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: Re: procfs full?? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2001 17:15:04 PST." <20010208011504.50B4236F9@sitemail.everyone.net> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:12:02 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Before folks get too excited, by definition, procfs is ALWAYS 100% used. This is normal and the nature of procfs. R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:15:04 -0800 (PST) > From: Benjamin Ossei > Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > It's pretty possible to fill out procfs b/c I noticed that mine was also at 100% filled. I haven't looked into it yet though. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message