From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 1 06:44:04 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA22684 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 06:44:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (omega.physik.fu-berlin.de [130.133.3.51]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA22664 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 06:44:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mordillo (oberon.physik.fu-berlin.de [130.133.3.126]) by omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id PAA20337; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 15:43:51 +0100 (MET) Received: (from graichen@localhost) by mordillo (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA00517; Mon, 1 Jan 1996 15:18:43 +0100 From: Thomas Graichen Message-Id: <199601011418.PAA00517@mordillo> Subject: Re: gcc and libg version in 2.1? To: spaz@u.washington.edu (John Utz) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 15:18:43 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "John Utz" at Dec 31, 95 05:45:52 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk hasn't John Utz said ? ... > > Hi gang > > i am still running 2.0.5. I am considering moving up to 2.1. What version > of gcc and libg++ are bundled with 2.1? > gcc 2.6.3 and libg++ 2.6.x t _______________________________________________________||___________________ __|| Perfection is reached, not when there is no __|| thomas graichen longer anything to add, but when there __|| freie universitaet berlin is no longer anything to take away __|| fachbereich physik __|| - Antoine de Saint-Exupery - __|| graichen@mail.physik.fu-berlin.de ___________________________||__________________graichen@FreeBSD.org_________