From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 09:23:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D331065670 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDC38FC08 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so3610637ewy.13 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:23:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tVBYapmGePA/stkdaOBX4hqSgJ/VzCuxSVwunGpK+jw=; b=kHiEiyU0oTkBbHyY0VYQZ/CFd4ol9evL4OsSGAiLOBE5fSgaCdjO62tFOFvg61AeA+ p7SJGLqPXsL5UI3qqzCXgwQ4QPoy7xoPjUznvqhhY5NPCQOqib6rSz/ml7JUNWa5DrsV nqIQQJGb5xFB4XGoWmpy5UixIOEFgbtH+49L8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.18.39 with SMTP id k39mr1812945eek.164.1314696226655; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.98.73 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E5CA9BE.2020005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net> <4E5CA9BE.2020005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:23:46 +0400 Message-ID: From: Sergey Kandaurov To: "Hartmann, O." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Hans Petter Selasky Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:23:49 -0000 On 30 August 2011 13:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 08/30/11 09:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> >> On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >>> >>> 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>> >>>> This website should be brushed up or taken offline! >>>> It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. >>>> >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html >>> >>> I think this one would better look like list of major features with os >>> comparison, like: >>> >>> =3D Networking =3D >>> =A0 * IPv6: major support, best stack around. >>> =A0 * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. >>> ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet). >>> >>> =3D Data storage =3D >>> =A0 * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Lin= ux >>> has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has >>> dynamic disks since XP (?features). >>> >>> =3D SMP =3D >>> =A0 * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?so= me >>> rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like >>> DragonflyBSD and QNX). >>> >> And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems >> which >> those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention. >> >> --HPS >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > What's about DTrace? > > =3D Development/System Profiling =3D > =A0* DTrace: Some notes of the Kernel Gurus what this could mean for > performance profiling and development > > =3D Licensing Model =3D > =A0* Some striking comments on the advantage for companies or interested > people of the BSD-like licensing model over the GPLv3 on which Linux is > based now and which has serious implications for those who wants to devel= op > and sell software developed on/with GNU stuff. it would be very honest, i= f > we do not only emphasize only the pros. BSD came from the academic > environment, that was where I met it the first time and I appreciated the > way things were developed and 'sloppyness' was a nogo. So we should keep = it > up and a serious and honest set of contraru points for all compared OS > should be appreciable. > > > Does the VM of FreeBSD still have advantges (measurable) over Linux? [Taking random email.] I think we could merge the $subj web page with this one (which is more actual, as of 7.0): http://www.freebsd.org/features.html --=20 wbr, pluknet