From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  5 15:00:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A598F84C
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2014 15:00:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CEAD26E0
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2014 15:00:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s55F0jwM087978
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:00:45 +0100 (BST)
 (envelope-from bz-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bz-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 167575] mfiutil(8) claims battery is OK even though it is worn
 out and wb cache is disabled
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:00:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: bin
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-167575-8-6yE2EChSWD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-167575-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-167575-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:00:45 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167575

--- Comment #3 from Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> ---
In both cases the battery had < 50% capacity -- 504 and 549 mAh, vs 1215 mAh
design capacity.  The write cache is disabled as expected, the issue is just
the battery status reporting.

BBU State of Health output as added in r219717

        switch (stat.battery_type) {
        case MFI_BBU_TYPE_BBU:
                printf("      State of Health: %s\n",
                    stat.detail.bbu.is_SOH_good ? "good" : "bad");
                break;
        }

and I suspect this would report "bad" for those batteries.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.