From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 5 15:00:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A598F84C for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CEAD26E0 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s55F0jwM087978 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:00:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from bz-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bz-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 167575] mfiutil(8) claims battery is OK even though it is worn out and wb cache is disabled Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:00:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:00:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167575 --- Comment #3 from Ed Maste --- In both cases the battery had < 50% capacity -- 504 and 549 mAh, vs 1215 mAh design capacity. The write cache is disabled as expected, the issue is just the battery status reporting. BBU State of Health output as added in r219717 switch (stat.battery_type) { case MFI_BBU_TYPE_BBU: printf(" State of Health: %s\n", stat.detail.bbu.is_SOH_good ? "good" : "bad"); break; } and I suspect this would report "bad" for those batteries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.