From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 18 15:52:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3292D106566B for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com (smtpoutm.mac.com [17.148.16.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1946B8FC14 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (asmtp006-s [10.150.69.69]) by smtpoutm.mac.com (Xserve/smtpout009/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id m3IFqlEN016616; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from macbook-pro.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/asmtp006/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id m3IFqiCO001875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Jeremie Le Hen In-Reply-To: <20080418132749.GB4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:52:42 -0700 References: <20080418132749.GB4840@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Integration of ProPolice in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:52:48 -0000 On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:27 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi, > > As you may already know I've integrated GCC's ProPolice into FreeBSD. > The build infrastructure overlord, namely ru@, (I'm quoting kan@) has > reviewed the patch and technically it is ready to hit the CVS tree. > > A few things should be discussed beforehand though. > > First, should we build world and/or kernel with SSP by default? Really, first is: what platforms does this apply to and/or have you tested this on? > I would like to reach a consensus on whether SSP should be opt-in or > opt-out on FreeBSD. That depends: what's the benefit of ProPolice on ia64? Also: please provide references to ProPolice. -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com