Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:22:09 -0700 From: possessor.assizer305@aceecat.org To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: List managers [Was: Link usability] Message-ID: <20230321192209.giqsnhqbl7ben6vk@beesty.loosely.org> In-Reply-To: <A7E64A3C-2D9C-4368-ACC9-A81403C163EC@nimnet.asn.au> References: <ca17a158b68d6cf2d0c261cc5f4268d5ef367482.camel@blues-softwares.net> <3faa3481-abe3-47cd-f273-2658db42a5bc@gmail.com> <11239785ba0531583f29189b133ceafdcded8aad.camel@blues-softwares.net> <ac194575-8e40-5e19-2478-a69fffbab278@freebsd.org> <5f1028aadd42bcbd89c62e843fc59798c52a0f36.camel@blues-softwares.net> <9B5F5E1E-555D-4FA8-AFBE-EBBD3A8A7045@nimnet.asn.au> <6eaa6e1f-af45-41f8-a5d7-2f03eb4f456a@freebsd.org> <A7E64A3C-2D9C-4368-ACC9-A81403C163EC@nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:49:11PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > Ah, right. Yet another consequence of the regressive move from > mailman plus pipermail to mlmmj is loss of clickable links in the > archived messages. Duh! Out of curiosity, what was the rationale for the move? My opinion: Mailman has its warts but it's ubiquitous and well suited for a world where almost everything has to be done in the browser for $REASONS. -- The other Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20230321192209.giqsnhqbl7ben6vk>