Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 11:09:09 -0700 (PDT) From: "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6724@bellsouth.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Subject: Re: How to start wine? Message-ID: <207964.57620.bm@smtp103.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What are LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH supposed to be? I see neither of these environment variables defined. I tried to add /compat/i386... binary directories to the path, but that was insufficient. I see /lib /libexec /usr/lib /usr/lib32 /usr/libdata /usr/libexec /usr/local/lib /usr/local/libdata /usr/local/libexec with the FreeBSD i386 installation not mounted. I have seen LD_LIBRARY_PATH before from building packages from source. I thought maybe wineboot would set up the environment, but it looks like I have to set up the environment beforehand. What is the difference between the various wine ports in $PORTSDIR/emulators? I used wine-devel, newer but less tested than wine. Upstream latest release is 1.6 as far as I can see. Building X for FreeBSD i386 before wine would be necessary for running from i386 boot even if not runnable from amd64. My i386 version was/is somewhat behind amd64 version. Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?207964.57620.bm>