From owner-freebsd-java Thu Feb 20 7:27: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3762337B401 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C7F43FBF for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:26:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net) Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.12) id 18lsb8-0000CZ-00; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:26:54 +0200 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:26:53 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Achilleus Mantzios Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jdk1.4.1-p2 hang Message-ID: <20030220152653.GX13372@starjuice.net> References: <20030220122048.GV13372@starjuice.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On (2003/02/20 14:44), Achilleus Mantzios wrote: > > Looking at the benchmarks on shudo.net [1], it seems like ShuJIT is > > _significantly_ inferior to Hotspot. > > did you try it??? > how about OpenJIT??? Nope. I trusted the benchmarks on the ShuJIT web site, which indicated that Hotspot was way faster in all tests performed. Assuming for the moment that Hotspot proves reliable, I'm not sure why using anything else would make sense. I didn't think that my comment would be taken as an insult to ShuJIT, because I was talking about their own benchmarks, not my opinion. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message