Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:21:51 +0100
From:      j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
To:        Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
Cc:        Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: newbussifying drivers
Message-ID:  <20010606112151.D10263@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010606010426.C28586@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d>; from alex@big.endian.de on Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 01:04:26AM %2B0200
References:  <20010605182151.A90883@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <200106052032.f55KWTj01513@mass.dis.org> <20010605230032.B96188@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20010606010426.C28586@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| You manually set the correct I/O port in the hints file and then you

Sorry if i misunderstand, but isn't the hints file only for -current?  I was
under the impression it was only to simplify driver development.

Since my goal is to clean up the driver under the newbus system, how would 
this port address issue be handled under -stable?  



jcm
-- 
"I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010606112151.D10263>