From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 07:21:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36686106564A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from smtp1.dlr.de (smtp1.dlr.de [129.247.252.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC418FC19 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:21:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beagle.kn.op.dlr.de ([129.247.178.136]) by smtp1.dlr.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:19:10 +0100 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:20:02 +0100 (CET) From: Hartmut Brandt X-X-Sender: brandt_h@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de To: Alexander Bubnov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20100326081637.W46084@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <4BAB5A77.7050505@mts.com.ua> <20100325142149.I44999@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Mar 2010 07:19:10.0723 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1623D30:01CACCB4] Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt Subject: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:21:50 -0000 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote: AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plus net-snmp has BSD like license. Many years ago I needed a small SNMP daemon for controlling some equipment. I looked at ucd-snmp (that was the name than) but decided against it because it was far too big. The even bigger problem was, that it didn't care about handling errors in the places I looked at. I use bsnmp alot in projects to do remote monitoring controlling of equipment - you don't need SNMPv3 for them and it is easy to write a new MIB for bsnmp. harti