From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 19:00:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7816106564A for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE0F8FC0C for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:5974:a369:b987:bc4d]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 01FA84AC1C for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:00:29 +0400 (MSK) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:00:26 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1957615267.20111123230026@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Does UFS2 send BIO_FLUSH to GEOM when update metadata (with softupdates)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:00:31 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-fs. Does UFS2 with softupdates (without journal) issues BIO_FLUSH to GEOM layer when it need to ensure consistency on on-disk metadata? Does UFS2 with SU+J issues this command? geom_raid5 respects this command, but when write log is enabled, it produces tons of "Unexpected softupate inconsistency" errors on crash. It seems, that there is no BIO_FLUSH and writes, which should be synchronous (metadata updates) isn't :( --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov