Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:48:15 -0500 From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS (Solaris 11 source 'leaked') Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2-dVRoA%2B8%2BTBmXiPcYu8gPpg_eHB2SNR6oJspZYtQq=EA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120103175607.GB10481@DataIX.net> References: <CAD2Ti2-R%2BV7Va4kBC1XaQGpNC9J33cDiYGpfBD2DxPyy0p0LWQ@mail.gmail.com> <39A90A91-4FB3-4B52-A7D2-4E0349B78E6F@ultra-secure.de> <CAD2Ti2-isYXegiV4AeARWdjwStQamZB-hjTPV3AfWg1rNqZAcA@mail.gmail.com> <20120103175607.GB10481@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Ethics are trouble for you arent they ? We all know well the history of BSD, the impact licensing has had with it, and where it needs to go. No one is suggesting crossing any ethical lines. Sure, some folks do sit too high atop their crystal towers by default. Thereby, and often to their detriment, failing to see all the different things (legitimate or not) available to them. Just as some folks dive too deep. Yes, I'd find it humorous if some anon decided to maintain their own public/private third party ZFS module, Solaris clone, or bugfix branch based on this. Is that a suggestion that anyone needing towers have anything to do with it, no [!], duh. It's just news, these aren't the droids you're looking for... :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAD2Ti2-dVRoA%2B8%2BTBmXiPcYu8gPpg_eHB2SNR6oJspZYtQq=EA>