From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 02:44:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6365A16A4CE for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 02:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from omega.metrics.com (ns.metrics.com [204.138.110.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579F043D45 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 02:44:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tomh@waterloo.equitrac.com) Received: from syncro.metrics.com ([192.168.96.20]) by omega.metrics.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA01911 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 05:44:49 -0500 (EST) Received: by SYNCRO with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 05:43:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Haapanen, Tom" To: "'amd64@freebsd.org'" Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 05:43:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: RE: Dual processor, AMD 64 machine freezing. X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 10:44:50 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > Not impractical -- Linux for AMD64 has NUMA support. So the follow-up question -- you must be expecting this already: is NUMA support on the roadmap for FreeBSD/amd64? Tom