From owner-cvs-etc Sat Feb 7 15:32:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA23225 for cvs-etc-outgoing; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 15:32:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-etc) Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (root@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA23215; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 15:32:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from panke.panke.de (anonymous213.ppp.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.213]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.8.6/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA22202; Sun, 8 Feb 1998 00:30:25 +0100 (MET) Received: (from wosch@localhost) by panke.panke.de (8.8.5/8.6.12) id AAA03256; Sun, 8 Feb 1998 00:24:02 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <19980208002401.01571@panke.de> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 00:24:01 +0100 From: Wolfram Schneider To: dima@best.net Cc: Wolfram Schneider , wosch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freebsd.org, bostic@bostic.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/periodic/daily 460.status-mail-rejects References: <19980205172342.07665@caramba.cs.tu-berlin.de> <199802051757.JAA12511@burka.rdy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.79 In-Reply-To: <199802051757.JAA12511@burka.rdy.com>; from Dima Ruban on Thu, Feb 05, 1998 at 09:57:03AM -0800 Sender: owner-cvs-etc@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 1998-02-05 09:57:03 -0800, Dima Ruban wrote: > Could you pelase describe the problem or is there a bug report? time sed -n -e "s/^$start.*ruleset=check_mail, arg1=<.*@\\([^>]*\\)>.*reject=.*/\\1/p" <, relay=[193.164.160.170], reject=451 ... Domain does not resolve Jan 31 20:00:23 hub sendmail[6976]: UAA06976: ruleset=check_mail, arg1=, relay=qmailr@srv1b.ic.net [152.160.72.20], reject=451 ... Domain does not resolve EOF stargazer.wisper.net lurch.rickl.org 8.51 real 7.46 user 0.05 sys 4 seconds per line is terrible slow. Wolfram > Thank you. > > Wolfram Schneider writes: > > On 1998-02-05 07:58:18 -0800, Dima Ruban wrote: > > > > Modified files: > > > > etc/periodic/daily 460.status-mail-rejects > > > > Log: > > > > Replace sed(1) with perl(1). The 4.4BSD sed programm is > > > > 200 times slower than perl or SunOS 5.5.1 sed. > > > Perhaps it should be fixed rather than replaced? > > > > Where is your patch? ;-) > > > > I'm very busy. If you found a solution, write a bug report. > > > > The bug occurs in a very special case. It does not > > hurt for average sed usage. > -- dima -- Wolfram Schneider http://www.freebsd.org/~wosch/