Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 05:19:59 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Port Management Team <portmgr@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: portupgrade Message-ID: <4C8F05FF.7060309@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <20100913173804.d4aa5eb9.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <4C8EB9BC.4020208@p6m7g8.com> <20100913173804.d4aa5eb9.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/14/10 00:38, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > there's a branch in projects/ we use for developing pkgtools. > This place is exactly where portupgrade-devel comes from. I've deleted my user svn portupgrade bits. > Saying this, I'm absolutely against passing the port to ports@. > The reason it's assigned on ruby@ and not ports@ is that we > don't want random people committing to this port thus possibly > destabilizing the important tool. Maybe assign it to new alias/group portupgrade@ then. - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFMjwX/dbiP+9ubjBwRAvi3AJ9rmRHVxZSGLeox3xU6PxR8I3kR/QCeJ0u5 xGicGG+31D/SoQ2PbjenxXQ= =MxJR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C8F05FF.7060309>