From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 24 21:31:30 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C4D16A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:31:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pursued-with.net (adsl-66-125-9-244.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net
	[66.125.9.244])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C268B43D60
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:31:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@pursued-with.net)
Received: from babelfish.pursued-with.net (babelfish.pursued-with.net
	[10.0.0.42])	by pursued-with.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1467F1A7725; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kevin Stevens <freebsd@pursued-with.net>
To: Dave Raven <dave@raven.za.net>
In-Reply-To: <00ba01c45a2d$66a34220$3200000a@lucy>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.58.0406241429090.4839@onorysvfu.chefhrq-jvgu.arg>
References: <00ba01c45a2d$66a34220$3200000a@lucy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd@pursued-with.net
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:31:30 -0000

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:

> # ifconfig fxp1
> fxp1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet x.y.186.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast x.y.186.255
>         inet x.y.186.1 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.1
>         inet x.y.186.15 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.15
>         inet x.y.186.14 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.14
>         inet x.y.186.142 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.142
>         inet x.y.186.33 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.33
>         inet x.y.186.124 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.124
>         inet x.y.186.250 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.250
>         inet x.y.186.122 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.122
>         inet x.y.186.25 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.25
>         inet x.y.186.127 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.186.127

I don't disagree with the other posters that mentioned DNS timeouts, but
in addition those broadcast addresses aren't right.  Since all the
addresses are within the same /24 subnet, they should all be .255 (which
is the default, so you wouldn't need to specify them.

KeS