Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:17:02 +0100
From:      Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pop filters from kqueue
Message-ID:  <5138D99E.8010700@erdgeist.org>
In-Reply-To: <513622F2.20902@mu.org>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303051633240.67262@erdgeist.org> <513622F2.20902@mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05.03.13 17:53, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

Alfred,

> I'm not sure if kqueue support this, however adding such a facility
> might be OK.

thanks for your reply. What would be the correct place to suggest such a
change?

> The only pain here is that it requires managing a doubly linked list and
> additional pointer dereferences.

Which seems extra absurd in the light of a performant implementation
already handling all this - within the kqueue. And it still does not
solve my problem that for every operation on my allocation I need to
update pointers both in the kqueue and in my linked list.

Regards,

  erdgeist



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5138D99E.8010700>