From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 19 10:20:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5607A16A4E0 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F29A43D2F for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:20:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1JIK7bv029007 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:20:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1JIK7YK029006; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:20:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:20:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200402191820.i1JIK7YK029006@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Balazs Nagy Subject: Re: ports/62926: [patch] sysutils/logrotate version update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Balazs Nagy List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:20:33 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/62926; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Balazs Nagy To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/62926: [patch] sysutils/logrotate version update Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:17:47 +0100 Hmm, I reread Writing FreeBSD Problem Reports just now and I resend it to bug-followup. Excuse me for the inconvenience. Rgds: Balazs -------- Original Message -------- Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Synopsis: [patch] sysutils/logrotate version update > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: krion > State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 17 04:51:57 PST 2004 State-Changed-Why: > Patches are wrong, they do not honour PREFIX. Try to install it to > another PREFIX than /usr/local > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=62926 I don't know whether my original reply is sent because of local bugs. Besides, I have a question: Can I assume that a port uses the same PREFIX as another? If so, here's the new patch: begin 644 logrotate-update-3.6.5.patch2 M9&EF9B`M7-U=&ELTU! M4U1%4E]3251%7U)%1$A!5%],24Y56'T*+4U!4U1%4E]3251%7U-50D1)4CT) M-RXP+V5N+V]S+VDS.#8O4U)035,*+4585%)!0U1?4U5&6#T)+3$N7-U=&ELU!/4E1.04U%?2TD>U!/4E1615)324].?0H@"BU-04E.5$%)3D52/0EJ MU=2 M2T1)4GT*(`HM15A44D%#5%]$15!%3D13/0DD>TQ/0T%,0D%317TO8FEN+W)P M;3)C<&EO.B1[4$]25%-$25)]+V%R8VAI=F5R'1R86-T.@HM"4`D>U)-?2`MU]$25-41$E2 M?21[1$E35$9)3$53?2!\("AC9"`D>U=22T1)4GT[(&-P:6\@+6DI"BT)0"1[ M5$%2?2`M>'IF("1[5U)+1$E2?2\D>T1)4U1.04U%?2YT87(N9WH@+4,@)'M7 M4DM$25)]"B`*('!OBD@/2`Q8S

U!2149)6'T**RL@("`@3$]!1$Q) M0D53("L]("U,)'M04D5&25A]+VQI8@HK*R`@("!#1DQ!1U,@*ST@+4DD>U!2 M149)6'TO:6YC;'5D90HK*V5N9&EF"BLK"BL@(R!(4"U56"!U7!E+F@^"BT@(VEN M8VQU9&4@/&1IPHM(`D);65SPHM0$`@+38S-"PX("LV,S0L."!` M0`HM("`@("!I9B`H;&]G+3YPPHM(`EM97-S86=E*$U%4U-?1$5"54