From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 22:14:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6B016A55A for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (smtp1.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.2.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF931441B6 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from nox.student.utwente.nl (nox.student.utwente.nl [130.89.165.91]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id kBAM1DLr018751; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:01:16 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:01:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200612082010.42744.news@budostore.de> <200612101314.01945.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <200612101314.01945.fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612102301.13124.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: RW Subject: Re: Configuration of Grub? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:14:24 -0000 On Sunday 10 December 2006 14:14, RW wrote: > I'm curious as to why people care about UFS support, since chainloading > works just fine without filesystem support. I have my menu.lst on a UFS filesystem. > > Is there a good reason for prefering "kernel /boot/loader" over > chainloading on FreeBSD? Because we can? :P Cheers, Pieter de Goeje