Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 May 2009 13:59:49 +0200
From:      Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
Subject:   Re: removing distfiles?
Message-ID:  <200905281359.50095.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090528122430.729c83a9@gumby.homeunix.com>
References:  <20090527224351.1e94029b@bobcat.edu> <200905280749.12509.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090528122430.729c83a9@gumby.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 28 May 2009 13:24:30 RW wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009 07:49:12 +0200
>
> Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 May 2009 03:13:46 RW wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 May 2009 22:56:10 +0200
> > >
> > > Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > > > Using e.g. 'portmaster --clean-distfiles-all' only removes those
> > > > distfiles that do not belong to installed ports.
> > >
> > > I've not used it myself, but there is also a shell script called
> > > distviper in bsdadminscripts which supports both of distclean's
> > > modes without the ruby dependence.
> >
> > What ruby dependence in portmaster? He said portMASTER not
> > portUPGRADE.
>
> I wrote: "supports both of distclean's modes without the ruby
> dependence".
>
> Portmaster only supports one of the modes, distclean has a ruby
> dependence.

I'm still not sure what ruby dependence you go on about. Could you point me to 
the line in portmaster that invokes ruby or a ruby script?
-- 
Mel



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905281359.50095.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions>