From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 09:12:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A7C238 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902AF8FC16 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so4350443iec.13 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:12:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WeCsbardrBFZJk8JStyrw8Cl1K6o9Goo5Q8TldDOYTQ=; b=SeHzF4rZkGOaz/a/atmMyc349tTyPDxdnQdpZL8aO8wI4pp18gp1QLtyOUQXH8+H4N 26BSZY2SvYXJz/LboPMIZkx7kdRqdkUYffY5w192BvGhsXQc2bwFhs2c8L3cv+I6viCr WKEFyHNFWA5JhjpttPKLhOIc/wDc6isuNifJazJ1smyGMCFLF13Mp/o00qm12XxqU+1c 3tu28zDUikk+R+PD+frFPWXzQjXg+lD8C4ecZaCPKL6ICaTYS7noyRuW9K7ea1R5baxg ArJQp5HUxjsPzjGjDlK7azh9FCs09TKnRYyURFVbxhsupxxiaRysZVB48f6sUwup4rC4 aeJw== Received: by 10.50.104.232 with SMTP id gh8mr13237531igb.45.1353489127626; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.132] (mau.donbass.com. [92.242.127.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wh5sm11531110igb.17.2012.11.21.01.12.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:12:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50AC9AE2.5010402@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:12:02 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121116 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jakubik Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 References: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:34:40 +0000 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:12:08 -0000 20.11.2012 23:03, Mike Jakubik wrote: >>> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about >>> config, >>> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. >>> And they >>> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. >> >> Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and >> Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. >> >> Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. >> >>> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html >>> >>> Graphs are available as PDF attachments >>> >>> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf >>> > > These numbers show very significant improvements. Any > possibility/interests in porting this scheduler to FreeBSD or this too > much work? I know many have and still complain about our current scheduler. That's a no go. In short DragonFly was sprung off long ago because Matt Dillon preferred the other way of working with multiple CPUs. From my point of view DragonFly kernel architecture is much closer to Singularity and Barrelfish. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.