Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:10:24 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Brandon D. Valentine" <brandon@dvalentine.com>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/63059: linux-flashplugin LATEST_LINK and RESTRICTED fixes
Message-ID:  <200402260010.i1Q0AO8u093317@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/63059; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <brandon@dvalentine.com>
To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" <ports@brandon.dvalentine.com>,
	FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/63059: linux-flashplugin LATEST_LINK and RESTRICTED fixes
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:07:04 -0600

 On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:51:57PM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
 > 
 > Is there a reason for doing this?
 
 Yes.  Though I must admit that it just took me a few minutes to remember
 why myself.
 
 In the do-install target I have made these changes:
 
 -	@${MKDIR} ${PREFIX}/${PLUGINSDIR}
 -	@${LN} -sf ${PREFIX}/lib/linux-flashplugin6/${f} ${PREFIX}/${PLUGINSDIR}/
 +.if exists(${PLUGINSDIR})
 +	@${LN} -sf ${PREFIX}/lib/linux-flashplugin6/${f} ${PREFIX}/${PLUGINSDIR}
 +.endif
 
 Both ports previously did the wrong thing and created PLUGINSDIR whether
 the netscape-linux or linux-mozilla ports were installed or not.  Now,
 the port will only install symlinks if those ports are already
 installed.  If those browsers are installed after flash is installed,
 the linkfarm scripts included with those browsers will find these
 plugins and create those symlinks on their own.  Because I no longer
 explicity create PLUGINSDIR, I can't rely on it existing during
 deinstall.  I couldn't list the symlinks in pkg-plist any longer because
 there would be errors during deinstall on systems without one of those
 browser ports installed.  "@unexec rm -f" will always succeed even if
 the files don't exist and deinstall will not emit any errors.  I have
 seen several other ports use this trick.
 
 An alternative I have considered is to conditionally set
 %%PLUGINSDIR%% to "@comment" via PLIST_SUB when the PLUGINSDIR doesn't
 exist.  The problem with that is this scenario:
 
 1) User installs linux-flashplugin6.
 2) User installs linux-mozilla.
 3) linux-mozilla port's linkfarm script installs symlink into PLUGINSDIR.
 4) User deinstalls linux-flashplugin6.
 5) There's now a dead symlink in PLUGINSDIR.
 
 The way I've chosen to do it at least ensures that the symlinks always
 get cleaned up.
 
 Perhaps I shouldn't be removing symlinks created by another port, but at
 present those ports create symlinks at install time based on whether my
 ports are installed.  There are uglier things lurking in the linux
 browser ports.
 
 I have been thinking for some time about proposing a central
 linux_browser_plugins directory similar to the
 ${X11BASE}/lib/browser_plugins.  This would go a long way toward taking
 care of the various hacks strewn throughout ports related to Linux
 browsers and plugins.  This however will require effort on the part of
 many port maintainers and I wasn't ready to tackle it in this update.
 
 HTH,
 
 Brandon D. Valentine
 -- 
 brandon@dvalentine.com                           http://www.geekpunk.net
 Pseudo-Random Googlism:  february is juvenile firesetters prevention
                          month



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402260010.i1Q0AO8u093317>