From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 12:53:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDF9106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B908FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Zg1-0004ry-Gf for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:52:57 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:52:57 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:52:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:52:54 +0200 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <4CA14009.4050906@softhammer.net> <4CA1E33C.70200@softhammer.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <4CA1E33C.70200@softhammer.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: gstripe small transaction size X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:53:02 -0000 On 09/28/10 14:44, Stephen Sanders wrote: > Increasing MAXPHYS and turning up the stripe size won't have the effect > I'm looking for ? I've missed you tuned MAXPHYS up. Yes, in this case it should work, if the underlying driver supports larger IO sizes. As I see it, if all of these are true: * MAXPHYS is upped to be at least stripe_size * number_of_drives (and possibly 2x that, to use "fast mode" of gstripe) * vfs.hirunningspace is > MAXPHYS * the driver supports IOs of at least your stripe_size * the file system doesn't introduce unnecessary choppiness in IO (i.e. use soft-updates) it is reasonable to expect streaming IO to your array will use larger transactions.