From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 12 22:57:32 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB8A16A418
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7D913C43E
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 72C681A4D7E; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:56:43 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: Peter Wood <peter@alastria.net>
Message-ID: <20071212225643.GZ61429@elvis.mu.org>
References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> <476066A5.8070707@alastria.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <476066A5.8070707@alastria.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: bikeshed for all!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:57:32 -0000

* Peter Wood <peter@alastria.net> [071212 14:53] wrote:
> > so, you see I really need a better name....
> > setrtab?
> >
> > rtab? rtbl?
> >
> > and the command should be called "????"
> 
> Would "vrf" (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) be to technical? From 
> experience Cisco's call it vrf, Junipers use routing-instance IIRC.

Yes, Juniper calls it "instance", although, I'm quite sure I've
heard "vrf" said over the cubes here.  

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein