Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:21:38 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 246623] [NEW PORT] www/caddy2 (Update to www/caddy)
Message-ID:  <bug-246623-7788-9CohrmhxhH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-246623-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-246623-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246623

Daniel Tihanyi <daniel.tihanyi@tetragir.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #214927|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #12 from Daniel Tihanyi <daniel.tihanyi@tetragir.com> ---
Created attachment 215958
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D215958&action=
=3Dedit
Caddy to Caddy2 Update

I've completely rewrote the rc file, now it works fine (I already run it in
production). It's much shorter and easier then before. Also
- Instead of caddy_flags, the user has to pass arguments to caddy_extra_fla=
gs.
This is to avoid to usage of using command_args.
- Extra commands now contains restart as previously "service caddy restart"
couldn't actually restart the process.
- Added caddy_adapter variable in case the configuration is not in caddyfile
format

Besides this, I experimented with DNS plugins. I had a working state where =
all
DNS plugins would be compiled in, but it drastically made the package bigge=
r so
I opted not to include all. I'm experimenting still to have a config option
where the user can chose 1 from the possible DNS plugins. I'm not sure when
will I have time to finish it.

I also edited the title to have caddy2 as a new port instead of just updati=
ng
caddy. This is because the configuration of caddy1 is not compatible with
caddy2. I also updated the maintainer to myself for the new port.

I tried a couple of methods to correctly include the version into the build,
but it doesn't seem to work so "caddy version" will still report (devel).

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246623-7788-9CohrmhxhH>