From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 09:57:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7E9B2DC73; Wed, 4 May 2016 09:57:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solene@bsd.zplay.eu) Received: from bsd.zplay.eu (bsd.zplay.eu [62.210.240.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bsd.zplay.eu", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7826E1C9B; Wed, 4 May 2016 09:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from solene@bsd.zplay.eu) Received: from localhost (bsd.zplay.eu [local]) by bsd.zplay.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 593a37d4; Wed, 4 May 2016 11:57:25 +0200 (CEST) To: Manish Jain Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 11:57:25 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sol=C3=A8ne_Rapenne?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: <1add9a0c3e6d67a61c6910a861937bb1@mail.zplay.eu> X-Sender: solene@bsd.zplay.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 09:57:30 -0000 Le 2016-05-04 09:11, Manish Jain a écrit : > On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: >> >>> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks >>> >>> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 >> >> Looks like this one: >> http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 >> >> Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory >> would be in one of the removable DIMMs. >> >> > > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ > pick up any errors in 65 passes ? > > Regards > Manish Jain > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" If you have 2 memory module, you can try each one separately. If you encounter your problem with one and not the other one, you found the problem.