From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 21 14:12:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02C84750 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from govert.macfreek.nl (govert.macfreek.nl [IPv6:2a01:238:43ed:a300:ea00:54c2:fb7a:7e66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B88433B53 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by govert.macfreek.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14B564A0C2 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:12:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from govert.macfreek.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (govert.macfreek.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XkUvMxhCwdhL for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:12:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from intra143.macfreek.nl (77-175-188-43.FTTH.ispfabriek.nl [77.175.188.43]) by govert.macfreek.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77A6164A0B5 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:12:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53F5FE3D.9020405@macfreek.nl> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:12:13 +0200 From: Freek Dijkstra User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: release web page: missing link to 9.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 14:12:18 -0000 Hi, The webpage http://www.freebsd.org/releases/ is missing a link to the (older) release 9.2 documents. Is this the right mailing list to request corrections to the www.freebsd.org webpages? (FYI, I was upgrading from 9.1 to 10.0 and thus needed both the 9.2 and 10.0 release notes to check what has changed; I found the docs, but figured I better report this small omission as well) Regards, Freek