From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 7 02:57:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16603106566C; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 02:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1438FC17; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 02:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-065-190-149-241.nc.res.rr.com [65.190.149.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p672vb24074720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:57:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4E1520A1.7070805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:57:37 -0400 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110531 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <4E1519B0.1050704@FreeBSD.org> <20110706193945.7d70ff73.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110706193945.7d70ff73.stas@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:57:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Status of migration to ruby 1.9 as default X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 02:57:40 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/06/11 22:39, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:28:00 -0400 > Steve Wills mentioned: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> In case anyone is interested, here's where we are with migrating to Ruby >> 1.9 as the default version: > > Thanks for a nice summary. Seems like a lot of work has been done. > > So when do you want to make the switch? I'm still not sure it's the > right time to do it as part of 9.0 release cycle, as it seems that some > of the important ports are broken and people still using 1.8 for production > (myself included). IMHO, the sooner the better. There will be some fallout, but at the moment, the rdoc port is broken and thus railties and rails as well. > WRT rdoc -- is there really a way to make ruby19 not install rdoc? My > impression was that rdoc now is part of ruby and this is the way to go... I'm working on that and I'm not 100% sure yet, but we did it for rake and gem, unless I'm misremembering, so I expect it to be possible. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOFSChAAoJEPXPYrMgexuh8IAH/2DRVA1ExMdFkcsJZPmDxe5M 5Y05L01hC3V/fPkZOgXWRFqxPLOqliKAGmLe5jcFvUI8nhysyXc6tvspSYOTh+Ff uDi/4BUSFOPDjx3fngf6jX8zGanGNylGNIuselZb7bH96LYcxV8MhftvSkzuzx3e O0gv9Vn59SPSwCmkd11EpoBvbVkdS+m5umoQ3U8Xnf0y/f2pszvmdElGLU9LT8Ap RT0l0kfxiXAqLA4nxT7FdlsnSHiUnvw6x6rtqND5r+4q4xI876xs/S4kWOuMi21y /6dQ3Ri6OcWrSmn85SvP4iSin4QoTcNDSIdzVLt5+UUjke58Z6my8hsn3+8pWYc= =EbhY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----