From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 29 07:09:32 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEC61065676;
	Tue, 29 May 2012 07:09:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au)
Received: from nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com
	[61.9.168.149])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7047A8FC08;
	Tue, 29 May 2012 07:09:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nskntcmgw08p ([61.9.169.168]) by nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com
	with ESMTP
	id <20120529070929.BFIT24726.nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw08p>; 
	Tue, 29 May 2012 07:09:29 +0000
Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au ([58.172.112.105])
	by nskntcmgw08p with BigPond Outbound
	id Fj9U1j00N2GVmci01j9V83; Tue, 29 May 2012 07:09:29 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=T/cOvo2Q c=1 sm=1
	a=0GO/22z+lHYfckWJ4naYnw==:17 a=twTT4oUKOlYA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10
	a=GHIR_BbyAAAA:8 a=lNKMvoqVF59USf-t1DEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
	a=0GO/22z+lHYfckWJ4naYnw==:117
Received: from white (white.hs [10.0.5.2]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.14.5/8.13.6) with ESMTP id
	q4T75du7094853
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 29 May 2012 17:05:40 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au)
From: "Dewayne Geraghty" <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au>
To: "'Doug Barton'" <dougb@freebsd.org>, "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>
References: <m2ehq3snv5.wl%randy@psg.com> <m262bfsl5q.wl%randy@psg.com>
	<4FC45139.70108@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:05:39 +1000
Message-ID: <CD4734118FE04AA8A9631C9E4B108D9F@white>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <4FC45139.70108@FreeBSD.org>
Thread-Index: Ac09YQIawcKN/839QHaYjcdoj2pl/QABchOA
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Cc: 'FreeBSD Stable' <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: clang tautology
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 07:09:32 -0000

Good point Doug, I guess the choice between a clang 3.1 and gcc 4.2.1
world/kernel is pending a  performance profile comparison.  The performance
comparison using specific applications (ports) indicates some improvement
of gcc 4.6 over 4.2 and certainly gains when openMP is advantageous.

Regards, Dewayne.