From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 5 07:27:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971961065670; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wooh@wooh.hu) Received: from mail.netidea.hu (netwarehouse.netidea.hu [195.228.254.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF1B8FC0A; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from radon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9C7129359; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:26:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netidea.hu Received: from mail.netidea.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by radon (mail.netidea.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fDpAUVYMULTC; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jamms-MacBook.local (catv-89-132-136-110.catv.broadband.hu [89.132.136.110]) by mail.netidea.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095A1129356; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C09FC43.8070804@wooh.hu> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:26:59 +0200 From: Adam PAPAI User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Cran References: <4C09932B.6040808@wooh.hu> <201006050236.17697.bruce@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <201006050236.17697.bruce@cran.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysbench / fileio - Linux vs. FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 07:27:02 -0000 On 6/5/10 3:36 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > Some quick tests show that ufs does do rather poorly on my system too. I have > the following filesystems setup: > > /var : ufs with softupdates > /usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled > /usr/src : zfs with compression enabled > /home : zfs with compression disabled and checksums enabled > > I ran a test with a blocksize of 8KB and 16 threads. > > /var : 25.2MB/s > /usr/obj : 64.8MB/s > /usr/src : 386.3MB/s > /home : 60.3MB/s > It seems I have to test it with zfs as well. Tomorrow I'm gonna test it. -- Adam PAPAI