From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 12:38:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3091065675 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:38:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4A58FC08 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so2435984wer.13 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 05:38:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/k5+6W9HisWJ3ucwFzyCIMpDLLO+zTER2iEiOP+7mig=; b=bCeG2q1aIT94+b9jxMcjdoazpkNkUJC6y5jXLRqs8ditO/wP5kjZ5p/ThzUvdEgf0m szvrnP+EkuSPc8Y2iBnL3H3OArm5cY0NR0Brt3jfCBalzXdpmpNjeOKhry742kqDX6u+ CCgNas9z99QFVAZmX7VN+qAVYJJhaELWSLV5qapuPqSf6Vr4a3QsVPwSw4bXkGDQu1r8 nSinzaIpelxvWCl7cFfnS0B8IAOq9r3IaUXNlTqFZ7wBzeYPlpf+6r8qlFt5zNdbIVle vbJuaRO+X2/rYJ8irAP9Xv/GgJXJ52KiawYnpogsy+Rbr6uuC9ifOokztUQvgDg4QQEY b4qQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.81.65 with SMTP id y1mr11605502wix.1.1340455075892; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 05:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.138.220 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 05:37:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3A.82.12873.59975EF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> References: <3A.82.12873.59975EF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 05:37:55 -0700 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:38:55 -0000 On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working > way > > to check whether the one is certified to work for Mac OS X to get USB > mass > > storage devices which work with *BSD :) > > > Just my 5 yen, > > -|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku > | __ < > > What if a USB mass storage device works with some BSDs but not all? > > I had Kingston Data Travelers, 2 GB, from one lot that were good with > Linux and FreeBSD but not NetBSD. > > Other USB sticks, including Kingston Data Tavelers, worked with Linux, > FreeBSD and NetBSD. > > I even installed FreeDOS 1.1 prerelease on one of those NetBSD-averse > Kingstom Data Travelers. > > But I think either Mac OS X, Linux or FreeBSD is much more > production-ready than NetBSD. > > > There are 3 drivers, one for 3.0, 2.0 and 1.0, and they are associated to > > corresponding devices at boot. I'll play around with it this weekend and > > see how to switch, i've also noticed issue connecting 2.0 device to 3.0 > > port. > > > Waitman Gobble > > San Jose California USA > > I don't think I ever tried to connect a USB 2.0 device to 3.0 port, but I > tried the opposite. > > My Western Digital My Book Essential 3.0 TB USB 3.0 drive works even on > the old computer whose motherboard's USB is 1.1. > > I tried to access that USB 3.0 hard drive on the new computer from USB 2.0 > port because NetBSD has no USB 3.0 support: no go. > > But when I installed USB 2.0 brackets to USB 2.0 headers on the > motherboard, the USB 3.0 hard drive was accessible from those USB 2.0 ports. > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > One possible 'caveat'.. I've noticed occasionally it will take 75 seconds or so for a USB 3.0 drive to 'connect'.. at first I thought the drive was not being 'recognized'. Someone has posted here that they believe it could be b/c a USB 3.0 uses 2x the power of 2.0 (i've not confirmed that) and it could be due to some kind of power management on the computer.. I've not yet taken the time to sort that out. anyhow this issue initially led me to believe there was some problem with the driver, but it seems likely not the case. Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA