From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 15:49:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85EF21F; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871BED7E; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pakbsde14.localnet (unknown [38.105.238.108]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DACADB9C0; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:49:14 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Sepherosa Ziehau Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a new TCP_IGNOREIDLE socket option Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:52:36 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p25; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201301221511.02496.jhb@freebsd.org> <51242B05.1040003@room52.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201302200852.37270.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:49:14 -0500 (EST) Cc: Lawrence Stewart , Andre Oppermann , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:49:15 -0000 On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:37:54 pm Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: > John, > > I came across this draft several days ago, you may be interested: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 Yes, that is extremely relevant. My application does use its own rate-limiting. And now that I've read this in full, this does seem to very much be what I want and is a better solution than ignoring idle handling entirely. Ironic that this was posted a few weeks after my patch. :) Clearly this is not an isolated workflow. -- John Baldwin