From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Apr 27 17:21:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFA614A12 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 1999 17:21:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from lot.gsoft.com.au (lot.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.106]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA06440; Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:51:06 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199904271949.MAA00904@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:51:06 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Mike Smith Subject: Re: Really slow SMP Cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@netplex.com.au, Terry Lambert Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 27-Apr-99 Mike Smith wrote: > > Clearly, the SMP patches are what had this effect; the question is why? > I know why; I'm waiting on feedback from peter regarding these patches, > but I'd appreciate anyone else seeing the problem to try them too. Hmm.. well they panic'd my machine :( I'll send you a proper error description later, as I only tried the patches before going to work :) Basically it asked if I wanted to panic, so I said no, then it probed, and after that it panic'd and didn't ask.. BTW I applied to patches to a tree checked out on 1999.04.08.12.30 CST because the last time I tried -current it panic'd my machine... --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message