From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 28 08:06:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B976C2; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22961111; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:9421:367:9d7d:512b]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BCF1B4AC57; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:06:35 +0400 (MSK) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:06:30 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1796551389.20130228120630@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Unexpected SU+J inconsistency AGAIN -- please, don't shift topic to ZFS! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:06:47 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-fs. My server runs 9.1-STABLE and have 8Tb UFS2 SU+J FS. It crashed a several minutes ago (I don't know reason yet) and fsck says "Unexpected SU+J inconsistency" (Inode mode/directory tyme mismatch) and requested full check (which will take more than hour on such FS). All drives are perfectly healthy according to SMART, it is SATA WD20EARS/EARX mix. In my experience, SU/SU+J fsck never completes successful on this FS :( Does SU+J work at all? Here was topic in closed mailing list about it, started as topic about using CURRENT on FreeBSD's cluster, but it was shifted to ZFS discussion without changing "Subject" line after several iterations without any conclusion. Could I do something to help debug this problem? Please, don't give advices like "Convert to ZFS". ZFS is great, but, I think, we should have robust "native" and simple FS too. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov