From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  8 11:28:33 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DDCF50
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Jul 2013 11:28:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A8B1D52
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Jul 2013 11:28:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 10D9A66144B
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Jul 2013 11:24:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-171-130.41-151.net24.it [151.41.130.171])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r689OPa5040033
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:24:27 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host
 adsl-ull-171-130.41-151.net24.it [151.41.130.171] claimed to be soth.ventu
Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18])
 by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r689ODcQ041497;
 Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:24:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Message-ID: <51DA853D.4020006@netfence.it>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:24:13 +0200
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130626 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leslie Jensen <leslie@eskk.nu>
Subject: Re: SV: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance
References: <tlu0ojyspei35nd7tvuxen91.1373133081362@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <tlu0ojyspei35nd7tvuxen91.1373133081362@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.1.2.13
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:24:27 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:28:33 -0000

On 07/06/13 19:51, Leslie Jensen wrote:
> Smb is slow by design compared to nfs.

Sure.
As I said, I was expecting lower performance; not *this* lower, however.

  bye & Thanks
	av.