From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 30 04:42:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075F016A4CE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:42:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from whoweb.com (whoweb.com [216.38.168.154])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B52543D58
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:42:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jon@whoweb.com)
Received: from whoweb.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6U4h5RX082279
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:43:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by whoweb.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6U4h5DB082278
	for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:43:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:43:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: jon <jon@whoweb.com>
Message-Id: <200407300443.i6U4h5DB082278@whoweb.com>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: mount_smbfs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:42:50 -0000


The mount_smbfs(8) command on 5.2.1 allows multiple mounts using the same
source and mount point.  This sounds like a bug to me since other file
systems such as ufs return an error on such attempts.  Anyone know of a
reason why this is allowed in mount_smbfs?

J