Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:54:27 -0400 From: Jerry <gesbbb@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opera 10.00 (native) & flash Message-ID: <20090907095427.3055470f@scorpio.seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <200909071515.03658.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <20090907184454.fa9c4d99.tmende@optusnet.com.au> <20090907104518.GA38234@free.bsd.loc> <20090907071429.59cab032@scorpio.seibercom.net> <200909071515.03658.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:15:02 +0200 Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> wrote: > For one, there are widgets. For two, it still supports > the nsplugin interface. For three, some people argue > that allowing extensions access to local disk, network > threads and pretty much everything in the browser, > including the ability to fight wars with competing > products[1], is less preferable. Then again, there are those who are not as paranoid as others. In any case, Opera (and I have not tried the 10 version) is IMHO, not as serviceable as many competing alternative browsers. However, if it meets your needs, then so be it. Please, do not CC me as I am subscribed to this list. I don't need two copies of the same post. -- Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com If you're constantly being mistreated, you're cooperating with the treatment.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090907095427.3055470f>