Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 15:17:20 +0200 From: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports-committers@freebsd.org" <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r392921 - in head: Mk accessibility/linux-c6-atk audio/linux-c6-alsa-lib audio/linux-c6-alsa-plugins-oss audio/linux-c6-alsa-plugins-pulseaudio audio/linux-c6-alsa-utils audio/linux-c6-... Message-ID: <CAALwa8k2Uu6%2BOfZbnewSgn=BzkRDfYgGCMkL7f=ggKd9ftkTHA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201507261306.t6QD6PgG039161@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201507261306.t6QD6PgG039161@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: netchild > Date: Sun Jul 26 13:06:24 2015 > New Revision: 392921 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/392921 > > Log: > 64 bit linuxulator support (not activated by default): > - most of the work was done by Alan Jude > - all errors are mine > - 64bit (may) have rough edges > - I validated > * that the 32bit part doesn't has deinstall regressions > * 29 of 72 64bit ports ports don't have deinstall leftovers (more validation > later, when I dare to activate the 64bit linuxulator in the kernel) > - the infrastructure part looks mature enough to let more test-bunnies get > some experience with it > - to use it you shall have no linux ports installed and have to specify > (on your own risk) the following in make.conf before installing the ports: > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6_64 > OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6_64 > > This is on top of the exiting c6 linux ports. Given that CentOS 7 is 64bits > only, we decided to have it as an "overlay" instead of new ports. > The 64bit part only installs 64bit executables, the 32bit ports can not be > installed at the same time (if needed we can think of letting the 64bit > overlay install the 32bit parts too, but given the CentOS 7 comment > above...). > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D174 > Submitted by: alanjude > Sponsored by: Essen FreeBSD Hackathon 2015 > Reviewed by: xmj, eadler (earlier versions) > Approved by: portmgr (implicit, I remember blanked approval for > linux parts loooong ago, punish me if you don't > agree anymore) Hi, This broke INDEX. Also, portmgr@ asked some questions and requested an exp-run in D1746 and those requests were ignored. So I doubt it was approved. Cheers, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAALwa8k2Uu6%2BOfZbnewSgn=BzkRDfYgGCMkL7f=ggKd9ftkTHA>