From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 28 23:02:34 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 692FC16A4CE; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:02:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2A80343D3F; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:02:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bms@spc.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 31633651F4; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:02:33 +0100 (BST)
Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 97625-06-3; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:02:32 +0100 (BST)
Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (vernpaq.icir.org [192.150.187.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 384E5651EB; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:02:32 +0100 (BST)
Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 3F2586247; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:02:23 -0700
From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>,
	Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20041028230223.GD2063@empiric.icir.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>,
	Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <20041027073858.GC719@empiric.icir.org>
	<417FF6D6.4010201@elischer.org> <20041027195233.GC770@empiric.icir.org>
	<20041028114134.GC50262@cell.sick.ru> <20041028223229.GC2063@empiric.icir.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041028223229.GC2063@empiric.icir.org>
Subject: Re: Implementing IP_SENDIF (like SO_BINDTODEVICE)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:02:34 -0000


--84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Looking at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/20.html I notice a
few differences. Seems to me that a route to one of the peer's other
addresses is going to be needed, and that the supernet example given
there might not work.

--84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: ''

iD8DBQFBgXp+ueUpAYYNtTsRAkowAJ0Uv20lW2DSCMSZqI4L4iFifIUIRgCgidmy
8UQFq2FOlw/icgxzBULUTVs=
=zEQD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--84ND8YJRMFlzkrP4--