From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Apr 26 16:53:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DE0B1C87F for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from null@pozo.com) Received: from pozo.com (pozo.com [50.197.129.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "pozo.com", Issuer "pozo.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD92D1F07 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from null@pozo.com) Received: from octo.pozo.com (octo.pozo.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=128) by pozo.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id u3QGr07j008642; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:53:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@pozo.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Weird portupgrade error on current amd64 From: Manfred Antar In-Reply-To: <67a1a7f4-7b4e-21f8-9168-d4cc4bd6490a@protected-networks.net> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:53:00 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Ports , knu@idaemons.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5530D6B5-0380-47DA-8A01-65979D87D4CF@pozo.com> <67a1a7f4-7b4e-21f8-9168-d4cc4bd6490a@protected-networks.net> To: Michael Butler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1, No X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on pozo.com X-pozocom-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pozocom-MailScanner-ID: u3QGr07j008642 X-pozocom-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-pozocom-MailScanner-From: null@pozo.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:53:08 -0000 > On Apr 26, 2016, at 9:42 AM, Michael Butler = wrote: >=20 > On 04/26/16 10:15, Manfred Antar wrote: >> When using portupgrade on current it fails when upgrading libraries. >> I can reproduce this on 3 different amd64 machines. >>=20 >> Example: >>=20 >> portupgrade -vf libnice ends like this: >>=20 >> ---> Build of net-im/libnice ended at: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 07:01:15 -0700 = (consumed 00:00:10) >> ---> Uninstallation of libnice-0.1.13 started at: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 07:0= 1:15 -0700 >> ---> Fixing up dependencies before creating a package >> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.2/pkgtools/pkgtools.rb:1180: warning: In= secure world writable dir /tmp/. in PATH, mode 041777 >> ---> Backing up the old version >> ---> Uninstalling the old version >> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.2/pkgtools/pkgtools.rb:1180: warning: In= secure world writable dir /tmp/. in PATH, mode 041777 >> [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 1593 packages found - done] >> ---> Deinstalling 'libnice-0.1.13' >> [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 1593 packages found - done] >> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >> ! libnice-0.1.13 (Broken pipe) >=20 > This appears to be related to kernels with SVN revisions between r298585 > and r298597. I am testing with a version after that to see if it has an > impact on the problem, >=20 > imb >=20 On SVN r298651 which I=E2=80=99m running it=E2=80=99s still broken Weird error !!! why only on certain ports. Thanks Manfred