From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 28 10:32:26 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10341503
 for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:32:26 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12E58FC13
 for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:32:25 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
 s=blargle; 
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
 bh=8HaS2y5fThx+p3bxsClJKqtj5ZffCLMmyYmZ43RTf34=; 
 b=l+JOHmpRIDchzZlaDy1bIB1YL1flTLA0aK7Hn0mT3mgmdoncmrm7PfVaEmDiUa82j0fotFu1d88tqA845znPZSbFZquxtmenqnKKMlcQxuleQtHk7MqO0OTeuJewEkRj;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
 by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <feld@feld.me>)
 id 1Tnx9X-000Ays-Dw; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:00:36 -0600
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
 with esmtpa id 1356552028-6527-6519/5/2; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:00:28
 +0000
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:00:26 -0600
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
To: moto kawasaki <moto@kawasaki3.org>
Subject: Re: 9.1R?
Message-Id: <20121226140026.355c0323@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <20121226.101725.1820314093910688497.moto@kawasaki3.org>
References: <20121222012933.5694d482@tech304>
 <20121223.183654.1876624675013089283.moto@kawasaki3.org>
 <001401cde2ff$094d4850$1be7d8f0$@ezwind.net>
 <20121226.101725.1820314093910688497.moto@kawasaki3.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
 <freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:32:26 -0000

On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:17:25 +0900
moto kawasaki <moto@kawasaki3.org> wrote:

> Official Support of FreeBSD as domU.
> # Didn't someone talk about it on this ML ?? or my imagination ??

I've mentioned it. The domU tools scripts are being redesigned to be =
more platform agnostic and a guy on that team at Citrix has been having =
me assist him with figuring out how to pull data in the format he needs =
as there are new features coming to XenServer. It looks like Citrix has =
interest in FreeBSD because a client wants to do a large deployment, and =
NetBSD will be easy too. They want these tools to be in FreeBSD ports =
and NetBSD's pkgsrc, so it will be well integrated with the community =
and the way the OS already is maintained. It just sounds like Citrix =
will be pushing patches to the port maintainer in the future (unless =
they take it over themselves).

Overall, things are looking bright for FreeBSD/Xen users.