From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 20:04:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6991D106566C for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@acm.org) Received: from mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F069A8FC0A for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-116-103.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.116.103]) by mail30.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id pADK4YZo029015 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:04:36 +1100 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pADK4YaE089415; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:04:34 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.5/8.14.4/Submit) id pADK4Vte089414; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:04:31 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:04:31 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Stanislav Sedov Message-ID: <20111113200431.GA89348@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20111109124325.17efc0d1.stas@deglitch.com> <20111109222435.GD92221@azathoth.lan> <20111110110637.GA3514@hades.panopticon> <4EBCC587.10701@FreeBSD.org> <20111111100708.GA24126@hades.panopticon> <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111111124012.3ec48cb3.stas@deglitch.com> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Dmitry Marakasov Subject: Re: Recent ports removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:04:59 -0000 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-Nov-11 12:40:12 -0800, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >Because portmgr@ is using it? There're numerous cases when unmaintained, = buggy, >vulnerable and plainly dangerous stuff stays in tree because someone in po= rtmgr >gang likes it when other applications not used by them being removed witho= ut >prior discussion notice. Because your opinion doesn't matter. Neither is= mine. I am getting heartily tired of your continuous tirade against the portmgr@ community. Please provide evidence to backup your accusations or retract them. As for the removal of obsolete ports - it has been made perfectly clear on many occasions that a MAINTAINER of ports@ means that port is _not_ maintained. If it's a port you use, feel free to take over maintainership. Otherwise that port is subject to removal if any problems with it crop up. --=20 Peter Jeremy --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7AIs8ACgkQ/opHv/APuIc+mwCcDGJmhQgLPoeYl/bfP/IGNEyf 4MEAn2khGQFYP1LGHl/7ugaWO7FizC6G =COq2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--