Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 21:21:59 +0000 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Renato Botelho <garga@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r524147 - in head/security: ca_root_nss nss Message-ID: <20200127212157.GA31571@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <a768-bvhm-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <202001260020.00Q0K1cG087750@repo.freebsd.org> <35c29ce8-67ab-61ea-b895-f70d2b6044fa@FreeBSD.org> <a768-bvhm-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 07:32:53PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote:
> Needs to be reported upstream. Only Tier1 architectures are critical
> enough to delay or block updates.
So POLA doesn't count for !Tier1? Not even for a port with many dependencies?
portsjail% grep ca_root_nss INDEX-10 | wc -l
7024
Also, this port is maintained by ports-secteam@, but I see no mention of a
maintainer approval.
mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200127212157.GA31571>